{"id":12538,"date":"2025-07-08T02:22:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-08T00:22:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.auto-ui.org\/25\/?page_id=12538"},"modified":"2025-07-22T09:56:27","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T07:56:27","slug":"monday-workshops","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.auto-ui.org\/25\/program\/monday-workshops\/","title":{"rendered":"Monday (Workshops)"},"content":{"rendered":"
Everyone who registers for the full conference can attend the workshop and tutorial sessions for free.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Date<\/strong>: September 22, 2025<\/span><\/p>\n Location<\/strong>: Location: QUT Gardens Point P-Block<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n W1 (Morning) – 1st Workshop on Exploring the Potential of XAI and HMI to Alleviate Ethical, Legal, and Social Conflicts in Automated Vehicles<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n As high-level, automated vehicles (AVs) become more present on our roads, resolving ethical, legal, and social implication (ELSI) conflicts in decision-making is a complex challenge. To possibly find solutions to such challenges, this workshop explores how Explainable AI(XAI), and Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) can improve transparency and increase trust, particularly in ambiguous situations. We propose a scenario-based workshop that invites participants to reflect on decision-making, expectations for explanations, and possible communication through HMI. Outcomes of this workshop will be the first step to meaningfully add XAI to ensure human-centered decisions of AVs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Organisers<\/strong> W2 (Morning) – The Future of In-Car Applications – How can Data & AI personalize the User Experience?<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n As in-car applications evolve, the potential to personalize the user experience through data and AI is becoming a key focus in automotive research. This workshop will explore how real-time data from sensors, user preferences, and behavioral insights can be leveraged to create individual in-car experiences. Current trends in AI-driven personalization, including voice assistants, adaptive interfaces, and predictive algorithms, will be discussed. Participants will dive into challenges such as privacy, data security, and user acceptance, while also exploring new possibilities for enhancing the in-car experience. Through interactive discussions and hands-on case studies, this workshop aims to uncover innovative ways to use AI and data to enrich automotive user interfaces.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Organisers<\/strong> W3 (Morning) – What makes a ready driver? A deep dive into the measurement and validation of readiness estimation for driver monitoring systems of partially automated (SAE level 2) vehicles<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Recent regulations and Euro NCAP requirements enforcing the inclusion of driver monitoring systems (DMS) in vehicle fleets have substantially increased the demand for a better understanding of how driver state changes during automated driving, and how this can be accurately measured. The term \u201creadiness\u201d is commonly associated with the likelihood of a successful recovery of manual control from vehicle automation and used as a proxy for determining driver state during SAE Level 2 automation. However, the implementation of a unified holistic metric to predict drivers\u2019 state has faced several challenges. For example, there is a lack of consensus on how readiness is defined and measured, as well as an absence of systematic validation protocols. To address this gap, this workshop will facilitate a discussion about the challenges and potential solutions regarding driver readiness measurement and validation, discussing the practicalities for implementation in DMS products.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Organisers<\/strong> W4 (Morning) – Ensuring Rigor in Systematic Reviews: Lessons from Healthcare to Develop Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tools for Transportation Human Factors<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Knowledge synthesis follows a transparent and reproducible set of procedures that systematically search and screen the literature and extract relevant data to answer a research question. In systematic reviews or meta-analyses, researchers need to critically evaluate potential biases (e.g., selection bias) that may influence the findings of included studies. This appraisal is typically conducted using risk-of-bias assessment tools; however, the existing tools are borrowed from healthcare research. This limits their usability and utility in transportation human factors (HF) and user interface (UI) research. Given the increasing interest in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field, tools that can facilitate transparent, reproducible, and thorough assessment of risk-of-bias are urgently needed to ensure rigor in evidence synthesis. Through group discussions and hands-on activities, this workshop will emphasize why risk-of-bias assessment tools tailored for transportation HF and UI research are needed and design and evaluate a prototype tool, for example HF studies.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Organisers<\/strong> Website<\/strong> W5 (Morning) – Shaping In-Vehicle Behaviours through Activity-Centered Design<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n In today\u2019s fast-paced society, most individuals commute either by personal vehicle or public transportation. User preferences and requirements are crucial, with design playing a significant role. Organisers<\/strong>Date & Location<\/h3>\n
\nQUT Gardens Point P-Block
\nGardens Point Rd, Brisbane City QLD 4000<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n08:00 – REGISTRATION OPEN<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
08:30 – 12:30 MORNING WORKSHOPS\u00a0
10:30 – 11:00 COFFEE BREAK<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
Krishna Sahithi Karur, Andreas Riener, Ignacio Alvarez, Philipp Wintersberger, Jeongeun Park, Seul Chan Lee<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Marco Wiedner, Tetiana Aymelek, Euiyoung Kim, Emilio Frazzoli<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Rafael Cirino Gon\u00e7alves, Courtney Michael Goodridge, Jorge Pardo, Am\u00e9lie Reher, Jonny Kuo, Audrey Bruneau, Natasha Merat<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Dina Kanaan, Suzan Ayas, Mattea Powell, Birsen Donmez, Greg A Jamieson<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
https:\/\/rob-assessment.github.io\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe nature of design should be such that it is both inclusive and assimilative, and its purpose is to propel innovation and progress while also improving the quality of life of the user. That is why a general focus was given to the user-centered design approach while developing vehicles, especially, cabin (cockpit) design. With prioritizing the user activities, it is interesting to explore how users\u2019 experience and behavior vary through the application of different design approaches. Nevertheless, existing literature has significantly overlooked the impact of design approaches on \u201chuman activity”. Therefore, the main objective of the workshop is to examine the relationships between activity-centered design and user behavior.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Ankit R. Patel, Pnina Gershon, Azra Habibovic, Fjoll\u00eb Novakazi, Sakura Akahoshi, Areen Alsaid, Kyungjoo Cha<\/p>\n<\/div>\n